Are space and time real?
According to cognitive neuroscience, our perceptual experience of  reality 	is only a distant and convenient mapping of the physical processes 	causing the sensory inputs. Sound is a mapping of auditory inputs, and 	space is a representation of visual inputs. Space and time are “unreal” 	from this point of view.
Though we may not like to accept it, the foundations to our knowledge  are 	philosophical. These foundations are assumptions in most cases. Some of 	the assumptions, especially the ones in physics, are not difficult to 	spot. Others that pertain to the nature of reality itself are far 	trickier to appreciate. The elusive assumptions include the existence  of 	time and space, for instance. The realness of reality is not merely a 	philosophical issue; it is a subject matter of cognitive neuroscience  as 	well. Once the issue of reality gets back to the realm of science, it 	becomes something that physics has to describe. Physics, in turn, is 	erected on the philosophical assumptions on the existence of time and 	space.
We can logically accept the virtual 
nature of time because  we have no 	direct sensory mechanism to sense or perceive time. Despite this  glaring 	absence, we do have a strong sense of time that plays a crucial role in 	every conscious decision we make in our lives. We can argue that the 	reason for the existence of time is our knowledge of our finite 	life-span. We can illustrate this argument by mapping the history of  the 	universe to 45 years. This mapping also shows how our physics of the 	universe is an ambitious extrapolation from a very short span of 	knowledge to incredibly long time scales. Also, physics has multiple 	notions of time – Newton’s constant time and Einstein’s malleable time. 	The difference between these notions of time is indicative of its  unreal 	nature. Time is unreal the same way as mathematics is unreal; they are 	both products of our intellect. And philosophically, they can be  thought 	of as formal languages.
Space
Unlike time, our perception of space is the end-result of our most 	precious sense, namely sight. For this reason, the unreal nature of  space 	is not as obvious as that of time. If we understand the workings of our 	sense of sight from the perspective of neuroscience, we quickly start 	doubting space as well. This suspicion turns into a conviction once we 	look at the cases where tiny physiological defects manifest themselves  as 	drastic disorders in visual perception. How sight creates space is 	analogous to how hearing creates sound. Sound is not the intrinsic 	property of a vibrating body, but our brain’s cognitive representation  of 	the air pressure waves our ears sense. In fact, our whole reality is 	nothing but a cognitive representation. Space is our visual reality, or 	the cognitive representation of the light inputs to our eyes. It is no 	more real than sound or smell. Or time.